Table 1 The manufacturers’ compositional information and experimentally determined filler weight percentage63 of the materials investigated, and bleaching agent used.

From: The effect of in-office bleaching agents on the Vickers hardness and surface topography of polished and unpolished CAD/CAM composite materials

Materials (code)

Manufacturer

Composition by weight (%) represented by manufacturers

Filler composition by weight (%) determined by ashing (SD)

Polymer matrix

Filler matrix

Polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN)

Vita Enamic (EN)

Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany

14% UDMA + TEGDMA

86% fine structure feldspar ceramic

85.1 (0.1)

Resin composite CAD CAM blocks

Grandio Blocs (GR)

VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany

14% UDMA + DMA

86% nanohybrid fillers

84.6 (0.01)

Lava Ultimate (LU)

3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA

20% (bis-GMA, UDMA, bis-EMA, TEGDMA)

80% silica and zirconia nano particles

74.8 (0.1)

BRILLIANT Crios (BC)

COLTENE, Altstätten, Switzerland

Cross-linked methacrylates (bis-GMA, bis-EMA, TEGDMA)

70% of glass and amorphous silica

70.1 (0.05)

Cerasmart (CS)

GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

Bis-MEPP, UDMA, DMA

71% silica and barium glass nanoparticles

66.1 (0.2)

Bleaching agent

Opalescence Boost

Manufacturer

Type

Composition

Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA

Chemically activated in-office bleaching agent

40% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), potassium nitrate and fluoride