Table 4 Comparisons of the geometric mean Cmax and Ctrough between predicted and observed data in different population ancestry.

From: Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for optimal dosage prediction of olaparib when co-administered with CYP3A4 modulators and in patients with hepatic/renal impairment

Clinical study

Ancestry

Dose (mg BID) /dosage form

No. of subjects

Age range/mean (year)

Proportion of female

Cmax (ng/mL, range/CV %a)

Ctrough (ng/mL, range/CV %)

Prediction/observation ratio

Prediction

Observation

Prediction

Observation

Cmax ratio

Ctrough ratio

Fong et al.10

Caucasian

200/Capb

17

19–82

0.67

4618 (3686–6854)

5620 (2830–17,100)

658 (276–999)

960 (210–2950)

0.82

0.69

400/Cap

6

  

9283 (7418–13,806)

7650 (5280–10,500)

1340 (558–2029)

1290 (660–3890)

1.21

1.04

600/Cap

5

  

14,034 (11,225–20,905)

11,500 (6490–17,600)

2072 (861–3126)

2180 (390–5950)

1.22

0.95

Dean et al.11

200/Cap

4

22–71

1.0

4747 (3530–6015)

4700 (35.6%)

698 (134–2055)

500 (191.2%)

1.01

1.40

400/Cap

4

33–60

0.75

9750 (7468–12,080)

9100 (27.2%)

1544 (357–3721)

1600 (46.1%)

1.07

0.97

Mateo et al.22

400/ Cap

10

50.9

0.91

9659 (7244–12,075)

5710 (2380–10,900)

1489 (319–3872)

1860 (530–6670)

1.69

0.80

400/ Cap

17

52.5

1.0

9428 (7487–11,458)

6360 (3880–13,300)

1398 (362–2992)

1040 (230–8490)

1.48

1.34

200/Tabc

13

59.1

1.0

6605 (5159–8302)

6880 (4010–10,400)

892 (148–2813)

1000 (280–3100)

0.96

0.89

300/Tab

17

55.8

1.0

9944 (7762–1250)

9370 (2280–14,700)

1358 (225–4254)

1840 (340–3830)

1.06

0.74

400/Tab

10

54.2

1.0

13,320 (10,387–16,747)

12,000 (8450–16,900)

1845 (308–5735)

2010 (760–3610)

1.11

0.92

Plummer et al.23

300/Tab

27

29–71

0.87

10,062 (8091–12,379)

9500 (4800–19,700)

1444 (296–3697)

2000 (600–11,400)

1.06

0.72

Yamamoto et al.12

Japanese

200/Cap

3

54–67

0.33

4971 (4228–6177)

4800 (31.6%)

696 (460–1084)

855 (NRd)

1.04

0.81

400/Cap

6

39–69

0.66

10,017 (8481–24,350)

5900 (19.7)

1413 (934–2202)

1220 (NR)

1.70

1.16

Yonemori et al.20

200/Tab

3

37–55

0.57

6480 (4453–9037)

7670 (46.9%)

675 (376–1357)

610 (157%)

0.84

1.11

300/Tab

6

44–64

1.0

9749 (6693–13,604)

8430 (35.1%)

1025 (567–2065)

1290 (157.6%)

1.16

0.79

Yuan et al21

Chinese

300/Tab

20

50–65

0.65

11,303 (9482–16,019)

8270 (35%)

1019 (459–2838)

800 (118%)

1.37

1.27

  1. aCV %, percentage coefficient of variation; bCap, capsule; cTab, Tablet; dNR, not reported.