Table 7 Linear regression analysis of the photos’ landscape features for different gender groups.
From: The difference in the elderly’s visual impact assessment of pocket park landscape
Dependent | Independent | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | t | Sig | Collinearity statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
Scores for female respondents (R^2 = 0.628, N = 141) | Constant | 1.855 | 2.418 | 0.015 | |||
Height of trees | 0.527 | 0.598 | 2.657 | 0.011 | 0.898 | 1.243 | |
Green colour richness | 0.278 | 0.425 | 1.563 | 0.021 | 0.963 | 1.981 | |
Stratification of green landscapes | 0.872 | 0.525 | 2.235 | 0.018 | 0965 | 1.231 | |
Scores for male respondents (R^2 = 0.681, N = 156) | Constant | 1.537 | 3.698 | 0.035 | |||
Height of trees | 0.962 | 0.963 | 2.121 | 0.001 | 0.898 | 1.128 | |
Green space ratio | 0.165 | 0.515 | 1.654 | 0.011 | 0.813 | 1.064 | |
Leisure facilities | 0.865 | 0.755 | 2.365 | 0.002 | 0.969 | 1.021 | |