Figure 2

Differences in DR severity based on Proposed International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy severity scale. (a) No difference accounted for 220 eyes (72.8%) of the total; Covered Optos imaging 1 step worse, 5 eyes (1.7%); Five-field imaging 1 step worse, 70 eyes (23.2%); Five-field imaging 2 or more steps worse, 2.3% (7 eyes). (b) No difference accounted for 267 eyes (88.4%) of the total; Covered Clarus imaging 1 step worse, 31 eyes (10.3%); Covered Clarus imaging 2 or more steps worse, 4 eyes (1.3%). (c) No difference accounted for 203 eyes (67.2%) of the total; Covered Clarus imaging 1 step worse, 79 eyes (26.2%); Covered Clarus imaging 2 or more steps worse, 19 eyes (6.3%); Covered Optos imaging 1 step worse, 1 eye (0.3%). (d) No difference accounted for 214 eyes (70.9%) of the total; Optos imaging 1 step worse, 24 eyes (8.0%); Optos imaging 2 or more steps worse, 2 eyes (0.6%); Five-field imaging 1 step worse, 55 eyes (18.2%); Five-field imaging 2 or more steps worse, 7 eyes (2.3%). (e) No difference accounted for 209 eyes (69.2%) of the total; Clarus 133° imaging 1 step worse, 82 eyes (27.2%); Clarus 133° imaging 2 or more steps worse, 11 eyes (3.6%). (f) No difference accounted for 204 eyes (67.6%) of the total; Clarus 200° imaging 1 step worse, 87 eyes (28.8%); Clarus 200° imaging 2 or more steps worse, 11 eyes (3.6%). (g) No difference accounted for 177 eyes (58.6%) of the total; Clarus 133° imaging 1 step worse, 95 eyes (31.5%); Clarus 133° imaging 2 or more steps worse, 26 eyes (8.6%); Optos imaging 1 step worse, 4 eyes (1.3%). (h) No difference accounted for 180 eyes (59.6%) of the total; Clarus 200° imaging 1 step worse, 96 eyes (31.8%); Clarus 133° imaging 2 or more steps worse, 26 eyes (8.6%).