Table 1 Summary of context effects.

From: Unraveling the influence of trial-based motivational changes on performance monitoring stages in a flanker task

 

Test statistic

p

Stimulus processing

 P2

PG

> 

LA

4.03

8.9979e−5

 N2

PG

LA

1.49

n.s

 P3a

PG

> 

LA

7.13

6.8248e−11

 P3b

PG

LA

− 1.97

n.s

Response processing

 ERN

PG

LA

3.46

n.s

 Early Pe

PG

LA

− 2.57

n.s

 Late Pe

PG

LA

3.47

n.s

Feedback processing

Negative feedback

 P2

PG

> 

LA

6.50

1.5757e−9

 FRN

PG

> 

LA

− 7.62

4.8062e−12

 P3a

PG

> 

LA

12.31

1.8517e−23

 P3b

PG

LA

− 2.42

n.s

 Theta (FCz)

PG

> 

LA

13.53

1.6092e−26

 Theta (Pz)

PG

LA

3.50

n.s

 Delta (FCz)

PG

LA

6.93

n.s

 Delta (Pz)

PG

LA

− 3.15

n.s

Positive feedback

 P2

PG

> 

LA

6.12

1.0570e−8

 FRN

PG

LA

− 0.78

n.s

 P3a

PG

< 

LA

− 3.92

1.4553e−4

 P3b

PG

< 

LA

− 7.81

1.7257e−12

 Theta (FCz)

PG

< 

LA

− 7.47

1.0978e−11

 Theta (Pz)

PG

< 

LA

− 4.68

7.2528e−6

 Delta (FCz)

PG

> 

LA

3.99

1.0880e−4

 Delta (Pz)

PG

LA

2.00

n.s

  1. PG, potential gain context; LA, loss avoidance context; ERN, error-related negativity; early Pe, early error positivity; late Pe, late error positivity; FRN, feedback-related negativity; Theta, theta power; Delta, delta power; > , effect for potential gain context is higher; < , effect for loss avoidance context is higher;  , no significant effect; test statistic, largest t value (t) for effect; p, corresponding p value; n.s., non-significant.