Table 1 Performance of the three approaches for Study 1.
Method | \(\mathcal {S}\) | Selection size | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_1}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_6}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_{12}}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_{22}}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_a\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIS | 25% | 6777.25 | \(s_1\) | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 |
50% | 8118 | \(s_2\) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | |
95% | 9887.05 | \(s_3\) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0 | |
DC-SIS | 25% | 6558.75 | \(s_1\) | 0 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 |
50% | 7935 | \(s_2\) | 0 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | |
95% | 9805.25 | \(s_3\) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | |
MrDcGene | 25% | 28.75 | \(s_1\) | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.31 |
50% | 99.5 | \(s_2\) | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.68 | 0.44 | |
95% | 1180.3 | \(s_3\) | 0.89 | 0.9 | 0.95 | 0.72 | 0.52 | |
