Table 2 Performance of the three approaches for Study 2.
Method | \(\mathcal {S}\) | Selection size | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_1}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_6}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_{12}}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_{\varvec{X}_{22}}\) | \(\mathcal {P}_a\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIS | 25% | 6872.75 | \(s_1\) | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 |
50% | 8030.5 | \(s_2\) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | |
95% | 9802.3 | \(s_3\) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0 | |
DC-SIS | 25% | 6584 | \(s_1\) | 0 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0 |
50% | 8111 | \(s_2\) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0 | |
95% | 9761.15 | \(s_3\) | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0 | |
MrDcGene | 25% | 327.75 | \(s_1\) | 0.53 | 0.26 | 0.92 | 0.1 | 0 |
50% | 1071.5 | \(s_2\) | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.15 | 0.02 | |
95% | 5313 | \(s_3\) | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 0.21 | 0.04 | |
