Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40223-4, published online 14 August 2023
The original version of this Article contained errors.
In the Author Contributions section,
“A.S.T. and S.V.: conceptualization, supervision, investigation, data curation, methodology. R.B., M.H.S., A.S.T. and S.V.: data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft. M.H.S., M.S.K, G.H.: provided sugarcane commercial hybrids, species clones and resources required for experiments. M.H.S., M.S.K, K.S.R., R.B., P.G., S.A., R.A.K. and V.K.: validation, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”
now reads:
“A.S.T. and S.V.: conceptualization, supervision, investigation, data curation, methodology. R.B. and M.H.S., A.S.T. and S.V.: data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft. G.H.: provided sugarcane commercial hybrids, species clones and resources required for experiments. M.H.S., M.S.K, K.S.R., R.B., P.G., S.A., R.A.K. and V.K.: validation, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”
In addition, the Funding section was incomplete.
“ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore is a Govt. Institute working under the umbrella of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. ICAR-SBI is involved in the sugarcane germplasm collections, maintenance, screening for drought/salinity/disease tolerance and its further utilization in breeding programme. The research work has been taken up at the Institute as a regular activity under the mandate of Institute. No extra funding from other sources has been received for conducting the presented work. This study was supported by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R347), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.”
now reads:
The research work has been taken up at the Institute as a regular activity under the mandate of Institute. No extra funding from other sources has been received for conducting the presented work. This study was supported by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R347), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for extending funding support for this publication. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tayade, A.S., Vasantha, S., Anusha, S. et al. Author Correction: Water-efficient genotypes along with conservation measures significantly reduce the green and blue water footprints in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Sci Rep 13, 18756 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45913-7
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45913-7
