Table 2 Comparison of VFSS findings using barium sulfate and iohexol contrast agent.

From: Usefulness of barium sulfate and iohexol as contrast agents for VFSS in visualizing components of swallowing predictable of poor outcomes

 

Barium sulfate, median (IQR)

Iohexol, median (IQR)

p valuea

FDS score

 Total score

31 (11.5–51.0)

30 (10–46.3)

0.056

 Lip closure

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

1.000

 Bolus formation

0 (0–3)

0 (0–3)

1.000

 Residue in oral cavity

0 (0–2)

0 (0–2)

1.000

 Oral transit time

0 (0–6)

0 (0–6)

0.317

 Triggering of pharyngeal swallow

10 (0–10)

10 (0–10)

1.000

 Laryngeal elevation and normal epiglottic closure

0 (0–12)

0 (0–12)

0.655

 Nasal penetration

4 (0–4)

4 (0–4)

0.180

 Residue in valleculae

4 (4–8)

4 (0–8)

0.078

 Residue in pyriform sinuses

4 (0–8)

4 (0–4)

0.039*

 Coating of pharyngeal wall after swallow

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

0.180

 Pharyngeal transit time

4 (0–4)

4 (0–4)

0.655

PAS score

3 (1–6)

3 (1–5)

0.162

Number of swallows to eliminate contrast from pharyngeal space

6 (3.75–10)

4 (2.75–6)

0.005*

  1. IQR interquartile range, FDS functional dysphagia scale, PAS penetration aspiration scale.
  2. ap-value was calculated by the Wilcoxon singed rank test. *p < 0.05.