Table 5 Two-way ANOVA, mixed design, and simple main effects analysis on visual quality measurement.

From: The influence of large-diameter multifocal contact lens on ocular surface, visual quality, and visual function for presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes

 

Two-way

ANOVA

main effects

Measurement

Post hoc( p < 0.05)

F

p

Blinking Frequency Lens on

F = 1.088

p = 0.357

Proclear:

1.899

.149

 

SMR

0.421

.739

 

Optimum:

2.198

.100

 

Blinking Frequency Lens off

F = 5.318

p = 0.002**

Proclear:

0.895

.454

 

SMR

3.050

.057

 

Optimum:

7.729

 < .001

W1 > BL , W1 > D1

MTF Total Area Ratio

(Left eye)

F = 78.958

p < 0.001**

Proclear:

71.318

 < .001

D1 > BL, W1 > BL, W2 > BL

SMR

13.752

 < .001

D1 > BL, W1 > BL, W2 > BL

Optimum:

20.766

 < .001

D1 > BL, W1 > BL, W2 > BL

MTF Total HO Ratio

(Left eye)

F = 39.467

p < 0.001**

Proclear:

13.440

 < .001

BL > D1, BL > W1, BL > W2

SMR

19.702

 < .001

BL > D1, BL > W1, BL > W2

Optimum:

20.211

 < .001

BL > D1, BL > W1, BL > W2

OSDI Score

(BL, W1, W2)

F = 3.443

p = 0.042*

Proclear:

0.207

.814

 

SMR

8.117

.002

W2 > BL, W2 > W1

Optimum:

3.567

.041

W1 > BL,

VBP Score

(BL, W1, W2)

F = 19.421 p < 0.001**

Proclear:

1.045

.369

 

SMR

1.233

.311

 

Optimum:

3.132

.047

W1 > BL, W2 > BL

  1. * p < .05, ** p < .01, > means “better than”.