Table 2 Summary statistics of genetic diversity parameters of four subpopulations of Eld’s deer.

From: Comparative genomics and genome-wide SNPs of endangered Eld’s deer provide breeder selection for inbreeding avoidance

Subpopulation

Sample size

Heterozygosity rate (Mean ± SD)

Genomic inbreeding coefficient (Mean ± SD)

Genomic inbreeding coefficient (Min)

Genomic inbreeding coefficient (Max)

SED-ZPOT

12

0.18 ± 0.05a, e

0.37 ± 0.16a, e

0.05

0.63

SED-DNP

22

0.16 ± 0.02b, g

0.45 ± 0.08b, g

0.23

0.61

BED-ZPOT

17

0.27 ± 0.04c, f

0.03 ± 0.14c, f

− 0.23

0.31

BED-DNP

30

0.25 ± 0.02d, f, h

0.16 ± 0.13d, f, h

− 0.002

0.63

  1. a, bDenotes a significant difference in the same column at p < 0.05.
  2. c, dDenotes a significant difference in the same column at p < 0.05.
  3. e, fDenotes a significant difference in the same column at p < 0.001.
  4. g, hDenotes a significant difference in the same column at p < 0.001.
  5. Sampling sites: SED-ZPOT, Siamese Eld’s deer of the Zoological Park Organization of Thailand; SED-DNP, Siamese Eld’s deer of the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation; BED-ZPOT, Burmese Eld’s deer of the Zoological Park Organization of Thailand; BED-DNP, Burmese Eld’s deer of the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation.
Back to article page