Table 3 Visibility (%) for all trials.
From: 3D vs. 2D simulated fetoscopy for spina bifida repair: a quantitative motion analysis
Trial | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motion Sequence | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D |
I: Dissections | 82.1 | 69.5 | 81.5 | 98.6 | 0 | 99.6 | 74.1 | 88.1 | 86.6 | 0 | 68.2 | 90.2 |
II: High force motions | 87.1 | 98.4 | 86.5 | 88.5* | 0 | 88.5* | 91.4 | 79.6 | 0 | 76.9 | 81.3 | 99.1 |
III: Interrupted suturing | 91.3 | 90.8 | 89.9 | 91.4* | 0 | 86.7 | 96.1 | 99.1 | 81.4 | 98.9 | 94.4 | 81.5 |
IV: Running suturing | 97.5 | 99.6 | 94.0 | 94.7 | 0 | 90.2 | 91.1 | 91.9 | 85.9 | 99.9 | 95.6 | 91.5 |
