Table 3 Comparison of different infrared small target detection methods on the MDvsFA-cGAN dataset.

From: Deep asymmetric extraction and aggregation for infrared small target detection

 

Method

\(IoU(\times 10^{-2})\)

\(P_{d}(\times 10^{-2})\)

\(F_{a}(\times 10^{-5})\)

Time (s)

FLOPs (G)

Params (M)

Model-Driven

Top-Hat10

4.59

61.87

151.09

0.0288

–

–

Max-Median11

3.06

54.67

222.76

0.0176

–

–

WSLCM29

12.73

92.81

259.35

14.1103

–

–

TLCM30

7.61

77.69

357.62

2.9738

–

–

IPI15

17.04

76.97

3.06

0.5691

–

–

NRAM31

10.01

54.67

2.56

4.2193

–

–

RIPT16

13.26

92.08

138.24

1.0926

–

–

PSTNN32

16.64

69.06

3.52

0.7275

–

–

MSLSTIPT33

5.12

48.92

2.21

0.083

–

–

Data-Driven

U-Net20

45.78

85.08

15.04

0.069

0.31

1.6

ACM5

46.65

84.92

9.03

0.078

0.30

1.6

ALC12

46.35

85.16

17.32

0.072

0.41

1.44

DNANet22

43.96

78.41

10.43

0.064

10.91

18.7

ISTDU-Net13

41.96

71.94

15.25

0.072

6.08

11.3

DAEA(S=3)

47.13

85.61

23.59

0.064

1.96

1.2

DAEA(S=4)

47.28

87.05

20.41

0.066

2.43

1.6

DAEA(S=5)

48.37

86.33

10.67

0.072

2.90

2.0

DAEA(S=6)

48.79

84.89

7.34

0.076

3.35

2.4

  1. The best results according to each metric are marked in italic, and the second in bold.