Table 4 Comparison of different infrared small target detection methods on the NUDT-SIRST dataset.

From: Deep asymmetric extraction and aggregation for infrared small target detection

 

Method

\(IoU(\times 10^{-2})\)

\(P_{d}(\times 10^{-2})\)

\(F_{a}(\times 10^{-5})\)

Time (s)

FLOPs (G)

Params (M)

Model-Driven

Top-Hat10

20.83

78.41

107.54

0.0288

-

–

Max-Median11

4.56

73.02

990.799

0.0176

-

–

WSLCM29

6.82

88.47

2098.72

14.1103

–

–

TLCM30

3.72

32.01

1162.42

2.9738

–

–

IPI15

23.41

79.47

53.32

0.5691

–

–

NRAM31

7.42

58.31

10.14

4.2193

–

–

RIPT16

30.41

92.06

185.31

1.0926

–

–

PSTNN32

14.87

66.98

29.06

0.7275

–

–

MSLSTIPT33

12.87

62.86

24.56

0.083

–

–

Data-Driven

U-Net20

75.58

96.72

24.63

0.069

0.31

1.6

ACM5

70.56

97.24

25.36

0.078

0.30

1.6

ALC12

73.79

97.86

21.09

0.072

0.41

1.44

DNANet22

88.91

99.25

2.34

0.064

10.91

18.7

ISTDU-Net13

86.47

97.98

3.71

0.072

6.08

11.3

DAEA(S=3)

75.37

97.52

20.61

0.064

1.96

1.2

DAEA(S=4)

77.94

98.20

14.63

0.066

2.43

1.6

DAEA(S=5)

81.32

98.48

7.23

0.072

2.90

2.0

DAEA(S=6)

80.26

98.10

12.45

0.076

3.35

2.4

  1. The best results according to each metric are marked in italic, and the second in bold.