Table 7 Comparison of EDLC performance with activated carbon electrodes using different biodegradable polymer based electrolytes.
System | E (Wh/kg) | P (W/Kg) | Cs (F/g) | Cycles | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVA+CH3COONH4+BmImBr | 2.18 | 34660 | 21.89 | 500 | |
PVA+dextran+NH4I | 0.44 | 63 | 4.2 | 100 | |
CS+MC+NH4I | 1.1 | 578.55 | 9.97 | 100 | |
CS+Dextran+NH4I | 7.59 | 520.8 | 67.5 | 100 | |
MC+NH4NO3+PEG | 3.9 | 140 | 38 | 4 | |
PVA+CH3COONH4+BmImCl | 2.39 | 19.79 | 31.28 | 500 | |
CS/MC+NH4F | 9.3 | 1282 | 64.1 | 100 | |
CS/PS+NH4F | 0.57 | 155 | 6.85 | 100 | |
Corn starch+LiClO4+SiO2 | 0.9 | 135 | 9.83 | 500 | |
Corn starch+LiPF6+BmImPF6 | 2.53 | 7790 | 37.07 | 500 | |
PVA+CH3COONH4+BmImTF | 0.17 | 18370 | 3.35 | 500 | |
CS:POZ: NH4CF3SO3:Gly | 43 | 1800 | 300 | 500 | This work |