Table 1 Comparison of centres based on the presence of discharge protocol worldwide and in Hungary.

From: Discharge protocol in acute pancreatitis: an international survey and cohort analysis

 

International

Hungarian

Protocol

No-protocol

p values

Protocol

No-protocol

p values

Patient number

1754

12,176

NA

688

941

NA

Length of hospitalization

n (%not missing)

1754 (100)

12,146 (97.8)

 

688 (100)

920 (97.8)

 

mean (SD)

8.55 (8.12)

11.75 (14.30)

 

8.20 (7.71)

13.04 (15.80)

 

median (Q1; Q3)

7 (5; 10.)

8 (5;12)

< 0.0011

6 (5; 9)

10 (7;15)

< 0.0011

Discharge CRP

n (%not missing)

1124 (64.1)

8102 (67.2)

 

688 (100)

482 (51.2)

 

mean (SD)

54.31 (61.99)

48.61 (61.95)

 

48.31 (46.38)

47.41 (59.82)

 

median (Q1; Q3)

29.75 (9.26, 80.00)

28.50 (11.80, 58.40)

0.5861

35.40 (13.78, 68.40)

22.88 (8.80, 62.03)

0.0031

Readmission within 1 month

n (%not missing)

1727 (98.4)

11,829 (97.2)

 

688 (100)

609 (64.7)

 

readmission n (%)

167 (9.7%)

1101 (9.3%)

0.6292

35 (5.09%)

114 (19%)

< 0.0012

Not pancreas related

62 (3.6%)

309 (2.6%)

0.0052

12 (1.7%)

67 (11%)

< 0.0012

Complication of index AP

39 (2.3%)

275 (2.3%)

 

4 (0.6%)

24 (3.9%)

 

Recurrent episode of AP

48 (2.8%)

464 (3.9%)

 

19 (2.7%)

23 (3.8%)

 
  1. 1Mood’s median test.
  2. 2Chi-squared test.
  3. The table shows the comparison of centres with and with no discharge protocol, clearly describing that protocolized discharge results in shorter LOH, higher discharge CRP values and lower rate of readmission. LOH is expressed in days, while CRP in mg/l.