Table 2 Comparison performance of photocatalytic membranes supplemented with inorganic NPs published in previous studied.
Materials | Method | NPs | light | Flux L/m2Â h | Efficiency | Pollutant | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CeO2 on stainless steel | Facile spray coating | CeO2 | UV lamp | – | 99.96% | MB (10 ppm) | |
GO-TiO2 /(PAN) | layer-by-layer | GO-TiO2 | UV 250Â min | 1.88 | 58.8% | (MB) 20Â mg/L | |
N,Pd /TiO2 /PSf | Phase inversion | N,Pd co-doped TiO2 | visible light 4 h | – | 97% | Dye (eosin yellow) (100 mg/L) | |
N-TiO2/PDVF Hollow fiber | Dry/wet cospinning | N-doped TiO2 | LED and UV 360Â min | 41.9 | 75% and 100% of visible and UV | Reactive Black 5 (RB5) | |
ZnIn2S4 /PVDF | Phase inversion | ZnIn2S4 | halogen tungsten lamp 3 h | 270 | 95% | Tetracycline 10 mg·L−1 | |
NRGT/PS | Non-solvent-induced phase-separation | N-doped GO/TiO2 (NRGT) | UV, and sunlight150 min | 210 and 220 with sun and UV | To 93% and 95% with sun and UV | (MB) 50Â mg/L | |
TiO2@HNTs PVC | Phase inversion | TiO2@HNTs | UV | – | 42.37%32.76 MB and RB | MB and RB dye 20 mg/L | |
(TNT)/PVDF | Phase inversion | Titania nanotubes | Hg lamps 90 min | – | 45.50% | brilliant green (BG) dye | |
Au0.1Ag0.9/TiO2/CA | Phase inversion | Au0.1Ag0.9/TiO2 | visible light | – | 80% | pulp and paper factory (Chooka) | |
PVDF-TiO2 hollow fiber | Phase inversion | TiO2 | UV A lamp 90–120 min | 45 | 60% | Organic Compound COD | |
TiO2/ZnO/PVC | Phase inversion | TiO2/ZnO | Sunlight 28Â min | 9.3 | 99% | Humic acid (0.5Â g/L) | Current study |
TiO2/ZnO nanocomposites | Sol–gel and hydrotherma | TiO2/ZnO | xenon lamp 80 min | – | 100% | Methylene blue (MB) (10 mg/L) | |
heterojunction ZnO/TiO2 | Precipitation | ZnO/TiO2 | UV 120 min | – | 90% | RhB (10–5 M) | |
ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposite | Sol–gel | ZnO/TiO2 | UV 3 h | – | 96% | methylene blue 50 ppm | |
ZnO/TiO2 Thin film | Doctor blade | ZnO/TiO2 | UV 12 h | – | 74.04% | Acetaldehyde 150 ppm | |
C QDs modified ZnO/ TiO2 nanotube heterojunction | Electrospun–hydrothermal | C QDs ZnO/ TiO2 | visible light 60 min | – | 95% | Rh B (5 mg/L) | |
Cu–ZnO/TiO2 nanoparticles | Sol–gel | Cu–ZnO/TiO2 | Visible light- 150 min | – | 97% | Methyl orange | |
ZnO/TiO2 | Sol–gel spin coating technique | ZnO/TiO2 | UV 240 min | – | 94% | Methylene blue (MB) |