Table 3 Comparison for biosynthesized CuO NPs for supercapacitor applications.
S. No. | Electrode material | Sc (F/g) | Capacitance retention (%) | Electrolyte | Power density (W/Kg) | Energy density (W/Kg) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CuO | 338 | – | KOH | – | – | |
2 | CuO | 2.14 | – | NaHCO3 | 0.171 | ||
3 | CuO–GO | 82.1 | 98 | KOH | – | – | |
4 | CuONPs/AC | 245 | 99.5 | Na2SO4 | 2091.6 | 45.9 | |
5 | CuFeS2 | 501 | 82 | Na2SO4 | – | – | |
6 | Cu2O | 87 | 74 | Na2SO4 | 737 | 39.3 | |
7 | CNT@TFcP/Cu | 280 | 80 | H2SO4 | |||
8 | CuO–rGO | 137 | – | Na2SO4 | 12 K | 14 | |
9 | Cu2O/RGO | 195 | 79 | KOH | 4114 | 37.7 | |
10 | CuO | 369 | 96.4 | KOH | – | – | This work |
