Table 1 Chromium concentration (mg/L) and removal efficiency (%) in floating treatment wetland reactors planted with Phragmites australis (Pa) and Iris pseudacorus (Ip) at different initial Cr concentrations for 50 days (“main experiment”) and 10 days (“supporting experiment”) (means and averages of 3 replicates).

From: Chromium (III) removal by perennial emerging macrophytes in floating treatment wetlands

Main experiment

No.

Metal concentration [µg/L]

Removal efficiency [%]

0 min

 ± SD

10 days

 ± SD

20 days

 ± SD

35 days

 ± SD

50 days

 ± SD

10 days

20 days

35 days

50 days

Pa-Cr500

500

100

6.1

1.0

8.2

2.0

14.3

3.0

15.3

3.0

99

98

97

97

Ip-Cr500

500

100

10.0

2.0

10.0

2.0

12.0

2.0

13.0

3.0

98

98

98

97

Pa-Cr1000

1000

180

6.6

1.0

9.9

2.0

18.7

3.0

20.9

4.0

99

99

98

98

Ip-Cr1000

1000

190

8.3

2.0

11.5

2.0

17.7

4.0

32.3

6.0

99

99

98

97

Pa-Cr2000

2000

360

7.8

1.0

10.0

2.0

17.8

3.0

21.1

4.0

99

99

99

99

Ip-Cr2000

2000

370

9.6

2.0

11.8

2.0

13.9

3.0

18.2

3.0

99

99

99

99

Supporting experiment

No.

Metal concentration [µg/L]

Removal efficiency [%]

0 min

 ± SD

30 min

 ± SD

1 h

 ± SD

2 h

 ± SD

24 h

 ± SD

10 days

 ± SD

30 min

1 h

Pa-Cr500

500

100

202

45

15

3.0

15

3.0

12

3.0

10

2.0

60

97

Ip-Cr500

500

100

197

38

18

2.0

18

2.0

15

2.0

15

2.5

61

96

Pa-Cr1000

1000

190

501

95

20

3.5

20

3.0

14

3.0

12

2.5

50

98

Ip-Cr1000

1000

170

480

99

15

3.0

15

3.0

18

3.0

18

3.0

52

99

Pa-Cr2000

2000

310

998

350

18

4.0

18

2.0

15

2.0

21

3.0

50

99

Ip-Cr2000

2000

330

1054

410

22

3.0

22

4.0

18

3.0

28

3.0

47

99

Cr500_cont

500

80

252

34

12

3.0

10

2.0

15

2.0

15

2.0

50

98

Cr1000_cont

1000

150

542

112

18

2.0

14

2.0

15

3.0

18

2.0

46

98

Cr2000_cont

2000

350

1132

178

32

3.0

33

3.0

28

5.0

31

6.0

43

98