Table 3 Performance comparison of the proposed CNN and VGG19 and VGG16 as feature extraction models. These values were obtained using a combination of Circlet and 2D-DWT bases as the input to the models. Italic values represent the best-achieved results for each dataset.
Feature extraction model | Dataset | ACC (%) | SE (%) | SP (%) | PR (%) | F1-score (%) | ROAUC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed CNN | A | 94.5 | 96 | 89.5 | 90 | 90 | 98 |
B | 90 | 92 | 84.5 | 86 | 85 | 96 | |
VGG19 | A | 93 | 94.5 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 96.5 |
B | 88.5 | 91 | 83 | 84 | 84.5 | 95 | |
VGG16 | A | 91.5 | 93 | 87.5 | 87 | 87 | 96 |
B | 87 | 90 | 82 | 83 | 82.5 | 94 |