Table 3 Comparison of mF AOs for desalination plant site selection.

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_1)\)

0.5595

0.4673

0.5863

0.6360

0.5574

0.3994

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_2)\)

0.6181

0.4497

0.7091

0.7205

0.6476

0.3231

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_3)\)

0.5911

0.4649

0.6304

0.7162

0.5966

0.3370

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_4)\)

0.5556

0.4507

0.5839

0.6406

0.5482

0.3868

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_5)\)

0.6283

0.4749

0.6778

0.6610

0.6293

0.3676

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_6)\)

0.6746

0.5102

0.7251

0.6676

0.6875

0.3760

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_7)\)

0.6451

0.4424

0.7547

0.7774

0.6663

0.2760

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_8)\)

0.6898

0.5236

0.7660

0.6570

0.7138

0.3870

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_9)\)

0.6376

0.4576

0.6905

0.7235

0.6389

0.3205

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{10})\)

0.6235

0.4181

0.6812

0.7865

0.6304

0.2550

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{11})\)

0.6288

0.4971

0.6854

0.6564

0.6524

0.3880

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{12})\)

0.6453

0.5008

0.6952

0.6642

0.6510

0.3859

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{13})\)

0.6499

0.4470

0.7379

0.7132

0.6698

0.3280

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{14})\)

0.6886

0.5333

0.7465

0.6433

0.7033

0.4108

\(S(\hat{\mathfrak {q}}_{15})\)

0.6673

0.5054

0.7716

0.6213

0.7122

0.4123