Table 3 Measurement invariance for the two-factor body responsiveness questionnaire model across gender in the second split-half subsample (n = 322).

From: Psychometric analysis of the body responsiveness questionnaire in the Portuguese population

Model

χ2

df

CFI

RMSEA

SRMR

Model comparison

∆χ2

∆CFI

∆RMSEA

∆SRMR

∆df

p

Configural

49.504

26

.976

.053

.090

       

Metric

62.009

31

.968

.056

.096

Configural vs. metric

12.504

.008

.003

.006

25

.028

Scalar

80.204

38

.957

.059

.097

Metric vs. scalar

18.196

.011

.003

.001

7

.011

Partial scalar

70.333

37

.966

.053

.097

Metric vs. partial scalar

8.325

.002

.003

.001

6

.215

  1. CFI comparative fit index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, SRMR standardized root mean square residual.
Back to article page