Table 4 Factors associated with awareness of oral frailty by binomial logistic regression analysis with stepwise variable selection.

From: Relationship between risk of oral frailty and awareness of oral frailty among community-dwelling adults: a cross-sectional study

Independent variables

ORs (95% CI)

p value

Gender (Female) (ref: Male)

1.60 (1.40–1.83)

 < 0.001

Age (years) (ref: 20–39)

 40–49

0.82 (0.66–1.02)

0.070

 50–59

1.03 (0.83–1.27)

0.811

 60–69

1.05 (0.85–1.30)

0.652

 70–79

0.78 (0.63–0.97)

0.026

 ≥ 80

0.56 (0.43–0.72)

 < 0.001

Residential areas (ref: Yokohama)

 Kawasaki

0.71 (0.60–0.85)

 < 0.001

 Sagamihara

0.69 (0.52–0.91)

0.009

 Yokosuka/Miura

0.96 (0.77–1.20)

0.716

 Shonan-tobu

1.08 (0.85–1.37)

0.543

 Shonan-seibu

1.14 (0.85–1.53)

0.381

 Kenoh

1.10 (0.88–1.39)

0.395

 Kensei

0.86 (0.60–1.24)

0.425

Exercise habits (Yes) (ref: No)

1.22 (1.05–1.41)

0.010

Eating a balanced diet (Yes) (ref: No)

1.52 (1.33–1.74)

 < 0.001

Consciousness of oral health (Yes) (ref: No)

1.62 (1.24–2.12)

 < 0.001

Risk of oral frailty (Low) (ref: High)

1.56 (1.33–1.84)

 < 0.001

Outpatient category (Hospital visit) (ref: Home visit)

1.63 (1.29–2.05)

 < 0.001

  1. CI Confidence interval, OR Odds ratio.
  2. Dependent variable: awareness of oral frailty (1: yes, 0: no).
  3. Independent variables entered the model were gender, age, residential area, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, exercise habits, smoking habits, eating a balanced diet, consciousness of dental health, risk of oral frailty, and outpatient category.