Figure 5

Clustering of the cao vit gibbon male calls based on affinity propagation (A, C) and compared to a manual approach (B, D). Each male phrase is plotted in two-dimensional space by applying Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimension-reduction to 181 different measurements. Top row: Semi-supervised affinity propagation applied to the ‘representative’ phrases (A) as compared to the manual clustering (B). Bottom row: Unsupervised affinity propagation applied to the full dataset (C) as compared to a manual approach (D).