Table 2 Comparative assessment in the sagittal plane: using one-way ANOVA test.

From: The role of implants and implant prostheses on the accuracy and artifacts of cone-beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study

Test groups

Mean

Standard deviation

F value

p-value

A-B

 C0

15.47a

0.12

17.443

0.000*

 C1

15.13bcdefgh

0.15

 TG1

15.70ab

0.10

 TG2

15.55ci

0.13

 TG3

15.63dj

0.06

 TG4

15.53ek

0.06

 TG5

15.93afijkgh

0.06

 TG6

15.53g

0.06

 TG7

15.53h

0.06

B-C

 C0

12.25

0.05

3.984

0.007*

 C1

12.41ab

0.10

 TG1

12.30

0.10

 TG2

12.27

0.06

 TG3

12.17a

0.06

 TG4

12.13b

0.06

 TG5

12.23

0.06

 TG6

12.23

0.06

 TG7

12.23

0.06

D-E

 C0

15.72abcdefgh

0.08

6.695

0.000*

 C1

16.16a

0.26

 TG1

16.23b

0.06

 TG2

16.25c

0.05

 TG3

16.27d

0.06

 TG4

16.23e

0.06

 TG5

16.27f

0.06

 TG6

16.03g

0.06

 TG7

16.07h

0.06

E-F

 C0

10.83

0.06

2.452

0.054

 C1

10.82

0.07

 TG1

10.97

0.06

 TG2

10.93

0.06

 TG3

10.90

0.00

 TG4

10.87

0.06

 TG5

10.87

0.06

 TG6

10.83

0.06

 TG7

10.83

0.06

  1. p > 0.05 statistically non-significant difference.
  2. * -p < 0.05-statistically significant difference.
  3. The identical superscript indicates statistically significant difference amongst designated groups for respective linear measurement (eg. A-B, B-C…E–F).