Table 8 The best design obtained by different algorithms on cantilever beam design problem.
Optimization technique | Optimal parameters | Optimal weight | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | ||
nSCA (This study) | 5.944606 | 4.865280 | 4.503500 | 3.492579 | 2.134620 | 1.303342 |
SCSO53 | 6.0164 | 5.3060 | 4.4935 | 3.5059 | 2.1516 | 1.339952 |
PSO53 | 6.0040 | 5.2950 | 4.4915 | 3.5125 | 2.1710 | 1.339983 |
RCGO54 | 6.020877 | 6.020877 | 6.020877 | 6.020877 | 6.020877 | 1.33996 |
ERHHO55 | 6.0509 | 5.2639 | 4.514 | 3.4605 | 2.1878 | 1.3402 |
GSA56 | 5.6052 | 4.9553 | 5.6619 | 3.1959 | 3.2026 | 1.41 |
GCA_I57 | 6.0100 | 5.3000 | 4.4900 | 3.4900 | 2.1500 | 1.3400 |
GCA_II57 | 6.0100 | 5.3000 | 4.4900 | 3.4900 | 2.1500 | 1.3400 |
MMA57 | 6.0100 | 5.3000 | 4.4900 | 3.4900 | 2.1500 | 1.3400 |