Table 2 Comparison of TC photocatalytic-degradation efficiency of this work with other visible-light-driven catalytic systems from recent literatures.
TC Con. (ppm) | Photocatalyst/membrane | Light source | Irradiation time (min) | Removal of TC (%) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 | SnO2-modified-g-C3N4 | Three 50 W fluorescent lamps | 120 | 90.29 | |
10 | Au-TiO2/pDA-PVDF | 300W xenon | 120 | 92 | |
10 | cobalt-doped ZnTiO3/Ti3C2Tx MXene | 300 W xenon | 1440 | ~ 80 | |
20 | MnFe2O4/BiOI | 500 W xenon | 200 | 83.04 | |
0.1 | ZnIn2S4/PVDF | 150W halogen | 2160 | 92 | |
30 | Type-1 α-Fe2O3/TiO2 | 500 W halogen | 120 | 97.5 | |
20 | Bi2WO6-CeO2/PVDF MoO3/g-C3N4 Z-scheme | Visible light | 200 | 82 | |
20 | TiO2-BiOBr-NCQDs/PVDF | 300W xenon | 120 | 77 | |
20 | AgBr nanoparticles decorated 2D/2D GO/Bi2WO6 | 350 W xenon | 60 | 84 | |
20 | AgI/BiVO4 p–n junction | 500 W xenon | 100 | ~ 85 | |
5 | Au-TiO2/PVDF | 300W xenon | 120 | 75 | |
10 | AgBr–TiO2-Palygorskite | 300W xenon | 90 | 90 | |
20 | Bi2WO6-CeO2/PVDF | Visible light | 200 | 82 | |
22.16 | g-C3N4 membrane reactor | 300W xenon | 143.776 | 94.8% | This work |
