Table 5 Relationship between PP and the risk of prediabetes in different sensitivity analyses.

From: Non-linear relationship between pulse pressure and the risk of prediabetes: a 5-year cohort study in Chinese adults

Exposure

Crude model I (HR, 95% CI) P

Model II (HR, 95% CI) P

Model III(HR, 95% CI) P

PP (10 mmHg)

1.19 (1.15, 1.23) < 0.0001

1.28 (1.23, 1.34) < 0.0001

1.15 (1.11, 1.18) < 0.0001

PP (quartile)

 Q1

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Q2

1.10 (0.94, 1.30) 0.2440

0.98 (0.83, 1.17) 0.0002

1.02 (0.88, 1.19) 0.7549

 Q3

1.22(1.05, 1.43) 0.0101

1.12 (0.95, 1.31) 0.1725

1.15 (1.00, 1.32) 0.0583

 Q4

1.94 (1.69, 2.24) < 0.0001

1.86 (1.61, 2.16) < 0.0001

1.64 (1.44, 1.87) < 0.0001

P for trend

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

 < 0.0001

  1. Crude model I was a sensitivity analysis performed after excluding participants with BMI ≥ 28 mmol/L (N = 15,967). we adjusted age, sex, ALT, AST, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, family history of diabetes, drinking status, and smoking status.
  2. Model II was a sensitivity analysis performed after excluding participants with age ≥ 60 mmol/L (N = 21,599). we adjusted sex, BMI, ALT, AST, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, family history of diabetes, drinking status, and smoking status.
  3. Model III was a sensitivity analysis performed on participants without family of diabetes. We adjusted age, sex, BMI, ALT, AST, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, HDL-c, smoking status and drinking status. HR, Hazard ratios; CI, confidence, Ref, reference.
Back to article page