Table 7 Optimal sizing results from the proposed algorithms for the studied configurations.
MS | Algorithm | \({N}_{pv}\) | PV (kW) | \({N}_{wt}\) | WT (kW) | \({N}_{batt}\) | BESU (kW) | \({N}_{DG}\) | DG (kW) | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PV/WT/BESU/DG | ISSA | 10 | 73.0000 | 9 | 45.1400 | 24 | 49.9999 | 3 | 2.4221 | 950.5462 |
SSA | 10 | 73.0000 | 12 | 56.1855 | 23 | 49.2601 | 3 | 2.5213 | 955.0167 | |
ALO | 14 | 96.5790 | 8 | 38.1487 | 23 | 49.6377 | 3 | 2.7940 | 1082.542 | |
DA | 22 | 156.8879 | 12 | 56.0965 | 22 | 47.9773 | 3 | 2.6395 | 1212.283 | |
MFO | 25 | 180.8246 | 5 | 25.2562 | 23 | 49.0679 | 4 | 3.7316 | 1319.526 | |
PV/BESU/DG | ISSA | 20 | 146.0460 | – | – | 24 | 49.9999 | 4 | 3.3284 | 1002.983 |
SSA | 21 | 152.6540 | – | – | 24 | 49.9980 | 4 | 3.4996 | 1055.774 | |
ALO | 26 | 185.4879 | – | – | 23 | 49.6009 | 4 | 3.4523 | 1455.23 | |
DA | 27 | 196.3262 | – | – | 24 | 49.9997 | 5 | 4.6178 | 1494.567 | |
MFO | 30 | 212.9717 | – | – | 22 | 47.3736 | 5 | 5.0000 | 1667.075 | |
WT/BESU/DG | ISSA | – | – | 22 | 105.6795 | 21 | 45.5421 | 4 | 3.7800 | 1024.599 |
SSA | – | – | 22 | 108.6075 | 20 | 41.6247 | 4 | 3.9000 | 1076.804 | |
ALO | – | – | 23 | 110.6090 | 20 | 41.5852 | 4 | 4.0000 | 1457.172 | |
DA | – | – | 25 | 121.8705 | 18 | 38.4849 | 5 | 4.5418 | 1491.183 | |
MFO | – | – | 25 | 124.9215 | 19 | 39.4913 | 5 | 4.1848 | 1623.207 |
