Table 3 Comparison of word retrieval ability and old age communication ability scale according to pre-post test.

From: Effects of workbook training using editorials and newspaper articles in adults with preclinical stage of dementia

 

Intervention group (N = 50)

Control group (N = 49)

Effect comparison

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

 

F

Confrontation naming task

S-K-BNT, number of correct responses (max = 15)

11.26 (1.96)

11.90 (1.72)

11.87 (1.83)

11.83 (1.82)

Between groups

0.643

Test period

5.086**

Group x test period

6.567*

DNT, number of correct responses(max = 30)

19.00 (5.00)

20.42 (4.66)

19.97 (5.53)

20.83 (5.33)

Between groups

0.478

Test period

26.251***

Group x test period

1.604

S-K-BNT, reaction time

2.13823 (0.60)

1.95265 (0.67)

2.16260 (0.81)

1.85175 (0.75)

Between groups

0.104

Test period

9.161**

Group x test period

0.583

DNT reaction time

3.36509 (1.14)

2.70206 (0.61)

3.19676 (1.15)

2.49330 (0.79)

Between groups

1.371

Test period

9.161**

Group x test period

0.037

Generative naming task

Semantic fluency

28.32 (9.72)

32.00 (9.20)

33.22 (9.68)

21.95 (10.04)

Between groups

1.729

Test period

4.10*

Group x test period

17.214***

Phonemic fluency

30.62 (13.43)

41.62 (12.57)

32.40 (14.72)

30.91 (12.75)

Between groups

3.124

Test period

25.369***

Group x test period

43.755***

Fill-in-the-blank task

Probe test

10.04 (3.97)

12.92 (3.46)

10.57 (4.33)

11.38 (3.86)

Between groups

0.463

Test period

42.340***

Group x test period

13.198***

Geriatric index of communicative ability (max = 60)

41.16 (7.37)

40.50 (7.65)

42.28 (8.20)

43.04 (7.59)

Between groups

1.586

Test period

0.008

Group x test period

1.771

  1. S-K-BNT short-Korean-boston naming test, DNT difficult naming test.
  2. ***Significant difference between Intervention and Control group with *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.