Table 5 Multivariable-adjusted association between markers of endothelial function and tertiles of nutrient pattern scores.

From: Nutrient patterns in relation to insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in Iranian women

 

Tertiles of NP1 score

Tertiles of NP2 score

Tertiles of NP3 score

T1 (n = 127)

T2 (n = 119)

T3 (n = 122)

P

T1 (n = 117)

T2 (n = 123)

T3 (n = 128)

P

T1 (n = 121)

T2 (n = 121)

T3 (n = 126)

P

E-selectin (mg/L)

 Crude

94.5 ± 7.2

81.3 ± 3.0

82.4 ± 3.4

0.11

98.6 ± 7.8

81.4 ± 3.0

79.6 ± 3.1

0.02

84.2 ± 3.5

89.3 ± 7.6

85.3 ± 2.9

0.75

 Model 1a

91.2 ± 5.5

81.6 ± 5.0

84.6 ± 5.8

0.42

95.8 ± 5.1

81.7 ± 5.0

81.0 ± 4.8

0.06

82.4 ± 5.6

86.7 ± 5.1

88.6 ± 5.6

0.76

 Model 2b

87.8 ± 6.7

83.0 ± 6.0

79.2 ± 7.2

0.73

82.9 ± 6.1

84.0 ± 5.9

83.1 ± 6.2

0.99

80.0 ± 6.6

78.6 ± 5.9

91.6 ± 6.7

0.35

 Model 3c

86.7 ± 6.8

83.2 ± 6.0

79.2 ± 7.3

0.80

82.9 ± 6.3

83.2 ± 6.0

83.0 ± 6.2

0.99

78.7 ± 6.7

78.8 ± 5.9

91.6 ± 6.7

0.34

 Model 4d

85.2 ± 6.9

84.7 ± 6.1

79.2 ± 7.4

0.84

84.9 ± 6.4

82.3 ± 6.1

82.0 ± 6.3

0.94

79.4 ± 6.8

79.0 ± 6.0

90.7 ± 6.8

0.42

sICAM-1 (mg/L)

 Crude

201.1 ± 6.4

201.3 ± 5.7

223.7 ± 8.5

0.03

212.4 ± 5.8

198.5 ± 6.4

214.4 ± 8.2

0.21

215.6 ± 7.6

199.7 ± 5.7

209.9 ± 7.4

0.27

 Model 1a

193.8 ± 7.6

198.0 ± 6.9

236.7 ± 8.0

0.001

212.3 ± 7.2

200.5 ± 7.0

215.2 ± 6.8

0.30

218.5 ± 7.8

200.6 ± 7.1

208.5 ± 7.9

0.23

 Model 2b

202.0 ± 11.0

214.8 ± 9.9

212.8 ± 11.9

0.67

206.5 ± 10.2

213.8 ± 9.8

208.5 ± 10.2

0.87

215.4 ± 11.0

203.0 ± 9.9

211.2 ± 11.2

0.68

 Model 3c

201.1 ± 11.3

214.9 ± 10.1

212.3 ± 12.1

0.64

206.6 ± 10.5

213.1 ± 10.1

208.3 ± 10.3

0.90

214.5 ± 11.2

203.1 ± 10.0

211.0 ± 11.3

0.73

 Model 4d

199.9 ± 11.6

215.4 ± 10.3

213.0 ± 12.4

0.58

206.4 ± 10.9

213.6 ± 10.4

207.9 ± 10.7

0.88

215.2 ± 11.5

203.5 ± 10.3

210.0 ± 11.5

0.75

sVCAM-1 (mg/L)

 Crude

502.5 ± 14.2

490.0 ± 12.6

496.9 ± 14.0

0.81

505.7 ± 14.2

505.0 ± 15.1

480.2 ± 11.6

0.31

505.7 ± 14.2

494.8 ± 14.7

489.3 ± 12.0

0.68

 Model 1a

496.8 ± 15.6

486.3 ± 14.2

504.2 ± 16.3

0.69

504.3 ± 14.5

506.9 ± 14.1

477.8 ± 13.7

0.26

502.1 ± 15.6

498.1 ± 14.3

487.2 ± 15.8

0.81

 Model 2b

506.4 ± 30.4

483.0 ± 27.3

488.1 ± 32.9

0.84

477.4 ± 27.1

547.3 ± 26.1

448.1 ± 27.2

0.03

493.2 ± 30.2

487.5 ± 27.3

497.2 ± 30.8

0.97

 Model 3c

501.6 ± 30.7

484.9 ± 27.4

483.8 ± 33.0

0.90

479.8 ± 27.7

541.2 ± 26.7

446.1 ± 27.2

0.05

484.9 ± 30.6

489.3 ± 27.3

496.1 ± 30.7

0.97

 Model 4d

498.9 ± 31.4

486.3 ± 28.0

485.2 ± 33.7

0.94

475.8 ± 28.4

546.7 ± 27.1

444.2 ± 27.9

0.03

490.3 ± 31.2

487.0 ± 27.8

493.1 ± 31.2

0.99

  1. All values are means ± SE. P were obtained from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Q quartile, E-selectin endothelial selectin, sICAM-1 soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, sVCAM-1 soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.
  2. aModel 1: Adjusted for age and energy intake.
  3. bModel 2: Further adjusted for physical activity (MET- h/wk), current corticoid steroids use (yes or no), current OCP use (yes or no), marital status (categorical), menopausal status (yes or no), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and socioeconomic status (categorical).
  4. cModel 3: Further adjusted for BMI.
  5. dModel 4: Additionally adjusted for blood lipids (serum triglyceride, serum total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL-cholesterol) and glucose.
Back to article page