Table 1 Comparison between the conventional and proposed methods on the cell image dataset of mouse livers.
From: Automatic enhancement preprocessing for segmentation of low quality cell images
Methods | IoU (%) | DSC (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | Cytoplasm | Membrane | Nucleus | Average | Cytoplasm | Membrane | Nucleus | |
U-Net | 57.90±1.33 | 71.38±4.80 | 40.32±3.84 | 62.01±2.65 | 72.36±0.73 | 83.21±3.31 | 57.36±3.95 | 76.52±2.01 |
U-Net++ | 57.29±1.23 | 71.38±4.67 | 39.80±4.20 | 60.68±3.16 | 71.84±0.59 | 83.21±3.22 | 56.82±4.35 | 75.48±2.42 |
Attention U-Net | 58.06±1.21 | 71.98±3.83 | 40.00±3.49 | 62.19±2.79 | 72.46±0.69 | 83.65±2.58 | 57.06±3.64 | 76.65±2.08 |
U-Net+++ | 56.80±1.24 | 72.60±3.77 | 37.18±4.95 | 60.63±2.58 | 71.18±1.11 | 84.07±2.54 | 54.01±5.33 | 75.45±2.00 |
SAUNet | 58.47±1.80 | 72.13±3.43 | 41.71±2.26 | 61.58±3.75 | 72.92±1.17 | 83.76±2.32 | 58.83±2.26 | 76.16±2.84 |
AEP+AWEL | 59.53±1.72 | 71.91±3.91 | 43.27±2.32 | 63.42±3.38 | 73.84±1.06 | 83.60±2.64 | 60.36±2.26 | 77.56±2.50 |
