Table 1 Significant clusters positively modulating performance.

From: Corticostriatal activity related to performance during continuous de novo motor learning

 

Peak (MNI)

Cluster size

(voxels)

Z-score

at peak

Corrected

P-value

X

Y

Z

Feedback on

L Putamen

−15

7

−7

2252

6.94

P <  < 0.01

L Angular Gyrus

−53

−71

49

357

4.95

P < 0.01

Mid Orbital Gyrus

−9

51

−3

290

5.10

P < 0.01

Feedback Off

R Putamen

25

9

−5

1441

5.56

P <  < 0.01

L Putamen

−23

7

9

1061

5.98

P <  < 0.01

R Inferior Parietal Lobule

57

−43

55

1027

4.58

P <  < 0.01

L Inferior Parietal Lobule

−55

−49

51

500

4.61

P <  < 0.01

R Middle Frontal Gyrus

37

35

21

342

5.51

P < 0.01

L Cerebellum VIII

−31

−67

−51

284

5.10

P < 0.01

L Cerebellum (Crus 2)

−13

−81

−31

256

5.44

P < 0.01

R Inferior Frontal Gyrus

49

17

9

245

4.68

P < 0.01

R Superior Medial Gyrus

7

27

45

233

4.57

P < 0.01

R Precentral Gyrus

45

−3

39

206

4.19

P < 0.01

R Superior Frontal Gyrus

25

9

55

201

4.67

P < 0.01

R Inferior Frontal Gyrus

41

45

−1

187

4.86

P < 0.01

Feedback On (Test)

R Putamen

29

5

1

185

4.77

P < 0.01

L Putamen

−29

9

−5

184

4.96

P < 0.01

*Mid Orbital Gyrus

−1

51

−3

28

3.79

N.S

Random Motor Control

L Sensorimotor Cortex (S1/M1)

−51

−21

47

4671

7.00

P <  < 0.01

R Cerebellum (VI)

17

−53

−21

2588

7.25

P <  < 0.01

R Inferior Parietal Lobule

41

−45

55

661

4.86

P <  < 0.01

L Cerebellum (VI)

−33

−63

−25

512

5.20

P <  < 0.01

L Thalamus

−17

−23

9

306

6.34

P < 0.01

L Putamen

−31

−5

−1

186

5.44

P < 0.01

  1. *voxel-wise p < 0.005 for this cluster presented in Fig. 2A, p < 0.001 was used for all the others clusters.