Table 3 Ability of the odor identification score to discriminate between categories of the A/T/N classification and corresponding cut-off values.

From: Odor identification score as an alternative method for early identification of amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease

Analysis No

Group 1

Versus Group 2

Comparative pathological stage

Mean (SD) (Group 1/Group 2)

P-value (t-test)

AUC

95% CI (De Long)

Cut-off

Specificity

Sensitivity

1

A−/T−/N−

A+/T−/N−

A+/T+/N−

A+/T+/N+

Normal vs. after amyloidogenesis

6.7(2.2)/4.5(2.1)

 < 0.0001

0.761

0.658–0.864

5.5

0.676

0.659

2

A−/T−/N−

A+/T−/N−

A+/T+/N−

A+/T+/N+

Normal to amyloidogenesis vs. after p-Tau accumulation

6.3(2.3)/4.5(2.1)

0.0006

0.717

0.604–0.83

4.5

0.830

0.514

3

A−/T−/N−

A+T−/N−

A+/T+/N−

A+/T+/N+

Normal to p-Tau accumulation vs. AD neurodegeneration

6.1(2.2)/2.2(2.3)

0.0011

0.716

0.588–0.844

4.5

0.786

0.545

4

A−/T−/N−

A−/T+/N−

A−/T+/N+

Normal vs. p-Tau accumulation without amyloidogenesis

6.7(2.2)/5.1(2.6)

0.0049

0.670

0.546–0.794

4.5

0.892

0.486

5

A−/T−/N−

A−/T+/N−

A−/T+/N+

A−/T−/N+

Normal vs. SNAP

6.7(2.2)/5.2(2.5)

0.0050

0.653

0.538–0.768

4.5

0.892

0.429

  1. The discriminative ability of odor identification scores according to the A/T/N classification was evaluated. Regardless of the presence or absence of neurodegeneration, the AUC for odor identification scores was high when amyloidogenesis occurred (Analysis 1). Analyses 2 and 3 were less sensitive, making it difficult to differentiate the processes leading to p-Tau  accumulation and neurodegenerative stages after amyloidogenesis. The AUC and sensitivity were low in the normal to p-Tau accumulation stage without amyloidogenesis regardless of the presence or absence of neurodegeneration (Analysis 4). After setting odor cut-off values for each A/T/N stage (A−/T−/N−, A+/T−/N−, A+/T+/N−, and A+/T+/N+), a post hoc power analysis was conducted; all stages met the criteria of a significance level of 5%, and a power of 80% at an AUC value ≥ 0.652. The results indicated that the sample size was sufficient to determine the cutoff value. Therefore, odor identification scores are excellent for differentiating amyloidogenesis but not p-Tau accumulation.
  2. A (+) amyloid-positive individuals with A/T/N classification; A (−) amyloid-negative; T (+) p-Tau positive; T (−) p-Tau negative; N (+) t-Tau positive; N (−) t-Tau negative; SD standard deviation; AUC area under the curve; CI confidence interval; p-Tau phosphorylated Tau; SNAP suspected non-AD pathophysiology.