Table 7 Optimal odor identification score combination from standard version for discriminating normal biomarkers and AD continuum individuals.
Variances | Estimate | Standard error | z value | Pr ( >|z|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis A. Coefficients of logistic regression model for the standard version (12 items) | ||||
(Intercept) | 4.172 | 1.589 | 2.625 | 0.0087** |
A (India ink) | − 1.350 | 0.702 | − 1.924 | 0.0544* |
B (wood) | − 1.655 | 0.708 | − 2.336 | 0.0195* |
C (perfume) | − 1.000 | 0.708 | − 1.414 | 0.1575 |
D (menthol) | 0.651 | 0.869 | 0.750 | 0.4534 |
E (Japanese orange) | 0.789 | 0.865 | 0.911 | 0.3622 |
F (curry) | − 2.125 | 1.461 | − 1.455 | 0.1457 |
G (gas leak odor) | − 0.416 | 0.671 | − 0.620 | 0.5354 |
H (rose) | − 1.204 | 0.727 | − 1.657 | 0.0975* |
I (hinoki (Japanese cypress wood)) | 0.418 | 0.781 | 0.535 | 0.5924 |
J (sweaty socks) | − 1.242 | 0.654 | − 1.899 | 0.0576* |
K (condensed milk) | − 1.016 | 0.747 | − 1.361 | 0.1737 |
L (roasted garlic) | 0.606 | 0.833 | 0.727 | 0.4671 |
AIC | – | – | – | 98.57 |
Analysis B. Coefficients of the best logistic regression model for the selected version (4 items) | ||||
(Intercept) | 3.777 | 1.244 | 3.035 | 0.0024** |
A (India ink) | − 1.254 | 0.602 | − 2.082 | 0.0373* |
B (wood) | − 1.960 | 0.598 | − 3.277 | 0.0011** |
F (curry) | − 1.885 | 1.203 | − 1.567 | 0.1170 |
J (sweaty socks) | − 1.197 | 0.604 | − 1.980 | 0.0477* |
AIC | – | – | – | 90.189 |