Table 6 Relationship between foreign soil resilient modulus and CBR value.
Encoding | Data source | Model formula | Model characteristics and test types |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dutch oil company Shell | E0 = 10CBR | E0 -Dynamic elastic modulus; Field test |
2 | Dutch oil company Shell | E0 = 5CBR | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field test |
3 | American Hcukclom | E0 = 6.5CBR | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
4 | American Asphalt Institute | E0 = 10.5CBR | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
5 | Kentucky, USA | E0 = 12.4CBR0.688 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field test |
6 | France | E0 = 2–5CBR0.555 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
7 | French Handbook for Road Design | E0 = 5CBR0.555 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
8 | Jcuffray Bacheler of France | E0 = 6.5CBR0.65 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Indoor test |
9 | British TRRL | E0 = 17.6CBR0.54 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field test |
10 | Japan Road Corporation | E0 = 2–4CBR0.555 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field test |
11 | Morocco | E0 = 8.9CBR0.85 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
12 | Czech Republic | E0 = 12.1CBR0.70 | E0 -Static resilient modulus; Field and Indoor |
