Table 3 Comparison of TC photocatalytic removal using the different photocatalyst.
From: Enhanced tetracycline degradation with TiO2/natural pyrite S-scheme photocatalyst
No | Catalyst | Light source | Experimental conditions | Efficiency (%) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | C3N4-TE@TiO2/UiO-66 | Visible light | [C0]:20 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.4 g/L, [pH]:4, [Time]:40 min | 96 | |
2 | Fe-MOF/CM | Visible light | [C0]:10 ppm, [catalyst]:0.375 g/L, [Time]:60 min | 100 | |
3 | FeNi3@SiO2@TiO2 | UV-light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.005 g/L,[pH]:9, [Time]:200 min | 100 | |
4 | Calcite/TiO2 | UV-light | [C0]:50 mg/L, [catalyst]:1.5 g/L, [pH]:7, [Time]:300 min | > 90 | |
5 | TiO2/Mo9O28-BMPP | Visible light | [C0]:25 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.15 g, [pH]:7, [Time]:115 min | 97 | |
6 | MWCNT/TiO2 | UVC-light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.2 g/L, [pH]:5, [Time]:300 min | 100 | |
7 | TiO2 | Visible light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.2 g/L , [Time]: 120 min | 56.7 | |
8 | AgI/UiO-66(NH2) | Visible light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]: 0.3 g/L, [pH]:4.3, [Time]:40 min | 80.7 | |
9 | In-doped Mn2O3 | Visible light | [C0]:50 mg/L, [catalyst]:10 mg/L, [pH]:7, [Time]:180 min | 93 | |
10 | MoS2/ZnSnO3 | Visible light | [C0]:30 mg/L, [catalyst]:0.25 g/L, [Time]:60 min | 80.2 | |
11 | BiVO4/FeVO4@rGO | Visible light | [C0]:30 mg/L, [catalyst]:25 mg, [pH]:2, [Time]:100 min | 91.5 | |
12 | Ag3PO4/AgBr/g-C3N4 | Visible light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]:0.5 g/L, [pH]:7, [Time]:10 min | 90 | |
[C0]:40 mg/L, [catalyst]:0.5 g/L, [pH]:7, [Time]:25 min | 80.2 | ||||
13 | AgBr-TiO2-Pal | Visible light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]:0.5 g/L, [pH]:9, [Time]:90 min | 90 | |
14 | CDs-ZnSnO3 | Visible light | [C0]:10 mg/L, [catalyst]:0.25 g/L, [Time]:60 min | 81.7 | |
15 | TiO2/NP | Visible light | [C0]:30 mg/L, [catalyst]:2 g/L, [pH]:7, [Time]:180 min | 100 | This study |
