Table 3 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for MU profile across tertiles of major NPs1.

From: Nutrient patterns in relation to metabolic health status and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adropin in adults

 

T1 (n = 175)

T2 (n = 176)

T3 (n = 176)

P-trend2

Tertiles of NP1 (High animal protein)

 Cases (n)

74

72

78

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

0.95 (0.62, 1.45)

1.09 (0.71, 1.66)

0.70

 Model 13

1 (Ref)

1.15 (0.72, 1.83)

1.29 (0.76, 2.18)

0.35

 Model 24

1 (Ref)

0.91 (0.42, 1.95)

0.83 (0.35, 1.98)

0.68

 Model 35

1 (Ref)

0.98 (0.45, 2.15)

0.90 (0.37, 2.18)

0.81

Tertiles of NP2 (High vegetable)

 Cases (n)

75

67

82

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

0.82 (0.54, 1.26)

1.16 (0.76, 1.77)

0.48

 Model 13

1 (Ref)

0.69 (0.44, 1.10)

0.84 (0.50, 1.41)

0.45

 Model 24

1 (Ref)

0.39 (0.20, 0.79)

0.65 (0.28, 1.48)

0.16

 Model 35

1 (Ref)

0.38 (0.18, 0.76)

0.60 (0.26, 1.40)

0.12

Tertiles of NP3 (High carbohydrate)

 Cases (n)

73

78

73

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

1.11 (0.73, 1.70)

0.99 (0.65, 1.51)

0.96

 Model 13

1 (Ref)

0.82 (0.51, 1.33)

0.62 (0.35, 1.10)

0.11

 Model 24

1 (Ref)

0.71 (0.33, 1.51)

1.08 (0.45, 2.59)

0.86

 Model 35

1 (Ref)

0.71 (0.32, 1.53)

1.08 (0.44, 2.63)

0.85

  1. NP nutrient pattern, MU metabolically unhealthy, T tertile, n number.
  2. 1All values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
  3. 2Obtained by the use of tertiles of major nutrient patterns as an ordinal variable in the model.
  4. 3Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, and energy intake.
  5. 4Model 2: Additionally adjusted for marital status, education, smoking status, socioeconomic status, physical activity, regular eating pattern, eating rate, intra meal fluid intake, and fatty food intake.
  6. 5Model 3: More adjustments for body mass index (BMI).
Back to article page