Table 4 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for individual components of MU across tertiles of major NPs1.

From: Nutrient patterns in relation to metabolic health status and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adropin in adults

 

Tertiles of NP1, high animal protein

P-trend3

Tertiles of NP2, high vegetable

P-trend3

Tertiles of NP3, high carbohydrate

P-trend3

T1 (n = 175)

T2 (n = 176)

T3 (n = 176)

T1 (n = 175)

T2 (n = 176)

T3 (n = 176)

T1 (n = 175)

T2 (n = 176)

T3 (n = 176)

High FBG levels

 Cases

35

27

42

 

34

34

36

 

35

38

31

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

0.73 (0.42, 1.26)

1.25 (0.76, 2.08)

0.36

1 (Ref)

0.99 (0.59, 1.69)

1.07 (0.63, 1.80)

0.81

1 (Ref)

1.10 (0.66, 1.85)

0.86 (0.50, 1.46)

0.57

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

0.81 (0.31, 2.10)

1.32 (0.46, 3.81)

0.55

1 (Ref)

0.71 (0.31, 1.63)

0.86 (0.33, 2.27)

0.69

1 (Ref)

1.38 (0.56, 3.42)

1.51 (0.51, 4.46)

0.46

Low HDL-c levels

 Cases

25

18

18

 

23

10

28

 

20

18

23

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

0.68 (0.36, 1.30)

0.68 (0.36, 1.30)

0.24

1 (Ref)

0.40 (0.18, 0.86)

1.25 (0.69, 2.27)

0.42

1 (Ref)

0.88 (0.45, 1.73)

1.17 (0.62, 2.21)

0.63

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

1.04 (0.33, 3.30)

0.50 (0.14, 1.83)

0.27

1 (Ref)

0.32 (0.10, 1.02)

0.84 (0.27, 2.67)

0.62

1 (Ref)

0.55 (0.14, 2.13)

2.12 (0.60, 7.49)

0.24

High TG levels

 Cases

60

63

70

 

70

63

60

 

56

70

67

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

1.07 (0.69, 1.66)

1.27 (0.82, 1.95)

0.29

1 (Ref)

0.84 (0.54, 1.29)

0.78 (0.50, 1.20)

0.25

1 (Ref)

1.40 (0.91, 2.18)

1.31 (0.84, 2.03)

0.24

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

1.11 (0.49, 2.48)

1.91 (0.78, 4.67)

0.14

1 (Ref)

0.51 (0.25, 1.04)

0.27 (0.11, 0.65)

0.01

1 (Ref)

1.30 (0.59, 2.85)

1.42 (0.57, 3.54)

0.45

Hypertension

 Cases

92

80

77

 

78

86

85

 

72

95

82

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

0.75 (0.49, 1.14)

0.70 (0.46, 1.07)

0.10

1 (Ref)

1.19 (0.78, 1.81)

1.16 (0.76, 1.77)

0.49

1 (Ref)

1.68 (1.10, 2.56)

1.25 (0.82, 1.90)

0.31

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

0.34 (0.15, 0.78)

0.23 (0.09, 0.61)

0.01

1 (Ref)

0.51 (0.24, 1.08)

1.28 (0.54, 3.03)

0.81

1 (Ref)

1.90 (0.85, 4.22)

1.58 (0.64, 3.92)

0.32

High HOMA-IR

 Cases

16

18

18

 

16

17

19

 

19

15

18

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

1.13 (0.56, 2.30)

1.13 (0.56, 2.30)

0.73

1 (Ref)

1.06 (0.52, 2.18)

1.20 (0.60, 2.42)

0.60

1 (Ref)

0.77 (0.38, 1.56)

0.94 (0.47, 1.85)

0.84

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

1.17 (0.31, 3.67)

0.91 (0.24, 3.52)

0.87

1 (Ref)

1.43 (0.50, 4.13)

2.61 (0.74, 9.22)

0.14

1 (Ref)

0.23 (0.06, 0.91)

0.96 (0.26, 3.59)

0.88

High CRP levels

 Cases

12

23

17

 

21

14

17

 

22

12

18

 

 Crude

1 (Ref)

2.04 (0.98, 4.25)

1.45 (0.67, 3.14)

0.38

1 (Ref)

0.63 (0.31, 1.29)

0.78 (0.40, 1.54)

0.46

1 (Ref)

0.51 (0.24, 1.06)

0.79 (0.41, 1.54)

0.46

 Fully-adjusted model2

1 (Ref)

2.53 (0.72, 8.83)

2.90 (0.71, 11.87)

0.16

1 (Ref)

0.39 (0.14, 1.12)

0.29 (0.09, 1.00)

0.03

1 (Ref)

0.37 (0.11, 1.22)

0.87 (0.25, 3.07)

0.72

  1. NP nutrient pattern, MU metabolically unhealthy, T tertile, n number.
  2. 1All values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
  3. 2Fully adjusted model: Adjusted for age, sex, energy intake, marital status, education, smoking status, socioeconomic status, physical activity, regular eating pattern, eating rate, intra meal fluid intake, fatty food intake, and BMI.
  4. 3Obtained by the use of tertiles of major nutrient patterns as an ordinal variable in the model.
Back to article page