Table 1 Synopsis of the feedback gathered during the community collaborative meeting and mapping session.

From: Systematic surveillance tools to reduce rodent pests in disadvantaged urban areas can empower communities and improve public health

Theme

Feedback from the majority of community members

Feedback from the minority of community members

Factors capable of influencing rodent proliferation

Disposal of food (leftover) in open spaces

Irregular garbage collection

Disposal of garbage in open bins

Lack of accessible dumpsters

Household ownership problems

Non-collection of bulk waste

Lack of funds for proper self-waste disposal

Poor enforcement of environmental laws

Erosion of personal pride

Overcrowding

Language barriers among some residents

Overreliance on government for cleanup exercises

Suggested solutions

Install dumpsters in strategic locations accessible to the residents

Removal of bulk waste e.g. derelict vehicles by the DEHS

Install signage stating “no dumping on vacant properties”

Implement additional community initiatives focused on educating and empowering the community and children using diverse languages e.g. use media as a strategic tool to raise awareness about rodent control efforts in the community

Owning cats

Enforce effective property management, mandating property owners and residents to ensure adequate cleanliness

Establish partnership with Community-Based Organisations, Churches and Schools to organise cleanup campaigns and promote sanitation awareness within the community

Tree planting

Collaborative mapping of rodent-related issues at the area level

Areas 1 & 6—ownership problem & haphazard waste disposal

Area 2—decent area with a moderately satisfactory waste disposal

Area 3—derelict vehicles & haphazard waste disposal

Area 4—presence of garbage; derelict vehicles and abandoned properties (houses)

Area 5—some garbage

Area 7—informal community & abundance of undocumented car garages

 
  1. Feedback from the majority of community members reflects the opinions of at least 8 out of the 11 participants, while feedback from the minority represents the opinions of 3 participants or fewer respectively.