Figure 1 | Scientific Reports

Figure 1

From: Acoustic and prosodic speech features reflect physiological stress but not isolated negative affect: a multi-paradigm study on psychosocial stressors

Figure 1

Forest plot of effect sizes and confidence intervals for all control-stress comparisons per paradigm. Note Effect sizes (dots; Cohen’s D) and 95% CIs (bars) for each control vs stress task comparison per stress induction paradigm (Cyberball—MIST). Dependent variables are grouped on their categories (i.e., physiological, self-report, speech) and are FDR corrected within their respective categories. Dots are circled black and ranges are saturated (i.e. non-transparent) if a significant effect is observed after correction.

Back to article page