Table 8 Comparative study of the HPSQB converter with similar converters in literature.
Topology | Gain | Total component count | Suggested application | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switch | Diode | Capacitor | Inductor | |||
Proposed converter | \(\frac{M(2+D)}{(1-D{)}^{2}}\) | 1 | 4 + 2 M | 4 + 2 M | 3 | Water treatment application |
Ref19 | \(\frac{M+1}{1-D}\) | 1 | 1 + 2 M | 1 + 2 M | 1 | Water treatment application |
Ref23 | \(M{V}_{CM}\) | 1 + 2 M | 1 + M | 1 + M | 0 | Pulsed voltage application |
Ref28 | \(\frac{1+(2M+3)D}{1-D}\) | 2 + M | 6 + 5 M | 1 | 4 + 2 M | Low input integrated application |
Ref29 | \(\frac{2(1+MD)}{1-D}\) | 1 | 3(1 + M) | 3 | 1 + M | Low voltage DC Source Integration |
Ref37 | \(\frac{3-D}{(1-D{)}^{2}}\) | 1 | 6 | 6 | 3 | Low voltage DC Source Integration |
Ref38 | \(\frac{3-D}{(1-D{)}^{2}}\) | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | Renewable power Source Integration |