Table 3 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for MUO across energy-adjusted tertiles of the DASH dietary score.

From: Association of priori-defined DASH dietary pattern with metabolic health status among Iranian adolescents with overweight and obesity

 

Tertiles of energy-adjusted DASH dietary scorea

T1

(n = 67)

(≤ 20)

T2

(n = 69)

(21–27)

T3

(n = 67)

(≥ 28)

P-trend

MUO phenotype based on IDF criteria

 Cases (n)

45

27

7

 

 Crude

1

0.31 (0.16–0.64)

0.06 (0.02–0.15)

 < 0.001

 Model 1

1

0.39 (0.19–0.80)

0.06 (0.02–0.16)

 < 0.001

 Model 2

1

0.42 (0.2–0.9)

0.08 (0.03–0.23)

 < 0.001

 Model 3

1

0.42 (0.20–0.90)

0.08 (0.03–0.22)

 < 0.001

MUO phenotype based on IDF/HOMA-IR criteria

 Cases (n)

41

19

7

 

 Crude

1

0.24 (0.12–0.50)

0.07 (0.03–0.19)

 < 0.001

 Model 1

1

0.28 (0.13–0.60)

0.24 (0.10–0.56)

 < 0.001

 Model 2

1

0.31 (0.14–0.67)

0.10 (0.03–0.30)

 < 0.001

 Model 3

1

0.31 (0.14–0.68)

0.09 (0.03–0.29)

 < 0.001

  1. All values are odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-trend was obtained by the use of tertiles of DASH diet as an ordinal variable in the model. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, and total energy intake. Model 2: Additionally adjusted for physical activity and socioeconomic status (parental education, parental job, number of family members, having car in the family, having computer/laptop, having personal room and having trip). Model 3: Additionally adjusted for body mass index (BMI).
  2. aComponents of DASH diet were adjusted for total energy intake based on the residual method.
Back to article page