Table 2 The test results of the compare study in Kvasir and CVC-ClinicDB.
From: Dual ensemble system for polyp segmentation with submodels adaptive selection ensemble
Train/Val | Kvasir 80%/10% | CVC-ClinicDB 80%/10% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Kvasir 10% | CVC-ClinicDB 10% | ||||||
Metric | Dice | mDice | mIoU | p | Dice | mDice | mIoU | p |
UNet | 0.814 | 0.857 | 0.822 | <Â 0.05 | 0.871 | 0.87 | 0.876 | <Â 0.05 |
UperNet | 0.855 | 0.884 | 0.861 | <Â 0.05 | 0.882 | 0.913 | 0.886 | <Â 0.05 |
Double-UNet | 0.794 | 0.824 | 0.797 | <Â 0.05 | 0.832 | 0.841 | 0.841 | <Â 0.05 |
SS-Former | 0.898 | 0.940 | 0.896 | <Â 0.05 | 0.923 | 0.958 | 0.929 | <Â 0.05 |
FCB-Former | 0.901 | 0.942 | 0.904 | 0.15 | 0.944 | 0.969 | 0.945 | 0.26 |
ESFPNet | 0.896 | 0.938 | 0.898 | <Â 0.05 | 0.945 | 0.971 | 0.946 | 0.41 |
Nanni’s Ens | 0.916 | 0.948 | 0.912 | 0.35 | 0.946 | 0.973 | 0.949 | 0.69 |
HarDNet-DFUS | 0.908 | 0.943 | 0.905 | 0.18 | 0.943 | 0.969 | 0.944 | 0.21 |
DET-Former | 0.923 | 0.954 | 0.924 | _ | 0.953 | 0.975 | 0.953 | _ |