Table 3 The test results of the compare study in ETIS-LaribPolypDB and CVC-ColonDB.
From: Dual ensemble system for polyp segmentation with submodels adaptive selection ensemble
Train/Val | Kvasir and CVC-ClinicDB 90%/10% | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | ETIS-LaribPolypDB | CVC-ColonDB | ||||||
Metric | Dice | mDice | mIoU | p | Dice | mDice | mIoU | p |
UNet | 0.668 | 0.798 | 0.741 | <Â 0.05 | 0.704 | 0.842 | 0.775 | <Â 0.05 |
UperNet | 0.671 | 0.804 | 0.774 | <Â 0.05 | 0.714 | 0.833 | 0.786 | <Â 0.05 |
Double-UNet | 0.633 | 0.795 | 0.760 | <Â 0.05 | 0.631 | 0.801 | 0.743 | <Â 0.05 |
SS-Former | 0.802 | 0.894 | 0.856 | <Â 0.05 | 0.789 | 0.882 | 0.836 | 0.18 |
FCB-Former | 0.803 | 0.899 | 0.861 | 0.09 | 0.792 | 0.887 | 0.839 | 0.42 |
ESFPNet | 0.793 | 0.891 | 0.849 | <Â 0.05 | 0.794 | 0.892 | 0.843 | 0.51 |
Nanni’s Ens | 0.806 | 0.903 | 0.863 | 0.32 | 0.795 | 0.891 | 0.843 | 0.56 |
HarDNet-DFUS | 0.748 | 0.862 | 0.821 | <Â 0.05 | 0.746 | 0.861 | 0.817 | <Â 0.05 |
DET-Former | 0.825 | 0.910 | 0.873 | _ | 0.798 | 0.894 | 0.851 | _ |