Table 3 Performance comparison of the iGM and other CGM devices available in the global market.
From: Internet of Things enabled open source assisted real-time blood glucose monitoring framework
| Â | Mechanism | Targets | Advantages | Disadvantages | Costs | Versatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iGM | Non-invasive NIR based. | Type 1 & 2 diabetes. | IoT based monitoring, battery life up to 6 months. | Real time data can be updated only with internet facility. | 30 $ | Wearable and wrist or earlobe based BG monitoring. |
CGM- abbott diabetes care Ltd, UK31 | Invasive-interstitial type. | Type 1 & 2 diabetes. | Measure interstitial glucose and stores 90 days of glucose data. | Separate sensor and reader. Expensive and 10-15 days’ battery life. | 306 $ | Attached to the body with separate display with WiFi connectivity. |
One care meta sense32 | Invasive-interstitial type. | Type 1 & 2 diabetes. | Self-activate the sensor. | Sensor backup for up to 14 days. | 66 $ | One touch activation and health coach through app |
Ultrahuman M133 | Invasive-interstitial type. | Type 1 & 2 diabetes. | Connects to aerobic activity. | Relaying glucose data to the app requires NFC connection. | 303 $ | Glucose-based meal score and optimization tips. |
