Table 5 Correlations among gait cycle variables, upper body strength, and skiing economy at sub-maximal speed (16 km·h−1) during double poling in experienced skiers (n = 5), novice skiers (n = 5), and the whole sample (n = 10).

From: Skiing economy and kinematic during a field double poling roller skiing among novice and experienced cross-country skiers

 

Novice

Experienced

Whole sample

Poling time (s)

− 0.873 (− 1.000 to 1.000)

− 0.564 (− 1.000 to 0.983)

− 0.558 (− 0.895 to 0.163)

Recovery time (s)

− 0.931** (− 1.000 to − 0.792)

− 0.900* (− 1.000 to − 0.250)

− 0.988** (− 1.000 to − 0.887)

Cycle rate (cycle·min−1)

0.983** (− 1.000 to 1.000)

0.900* (− 0.370 to 1.000)

0.964** (0.747 to 1.000)

Cycle length (m)

− 0.950* (− 1.000 to 1.000)

− 0.900* (− 1.000 to − 0.190)

− 0.964** (− 1.000 to − 0.768)

BP 1RM (kg)

− 0.900* (− 1.000 to − 0.250)

− 0.700 (− 1.000 to 0.757)

− 0.952** (− 1.000 to − 0.691)

BP power (40% 1RM)

− 0.900* (− 1.000 to − 0.191)

− 0.500 (− 1.000 to 0.929)

− 0.927** (− 1.000 to − 0.506)

  1. Data are Spearman’s ρ correlation coefficients, with 95% confidence intervals across 100 Bootstrap samples are presented.
  2. BP 1RM a one-repetition maximal value for bench press, BP power the maximal power output during the 40% of 1RM in a bench press.
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001. A p-value < 0.05 indicates statistical significance, while a p-value < 0.01 represents strong statistical significance.