Table 4 Effect of microbial inoculation on pigment, protein and soluble sugar content of chickpea (var. Pusa 362) grown under water stress.

From: Chasmophyte associated stress tolerant bacteria confer drought resilience to chickpea through efficient nutrient mining and modulation of stress response

Treatments

Chl a (mg g−1)

Chl b (mg g−1)

Carotenoids (mg g−1)

Protein (mg g−1 f.w)

Soluble sugar (mg g−1 f.w)

Proline (µg g−1 f.w)

L38 + 30% FC

21.85 ± 0.07a

13.02 ± 0.31a

2.73 ± 0.04a

3.34 ± 0.05a

84.07 ± 0.29c,d

233.3 ± 7.63g

LA9 + 30% FC

16.99 ± 0.07f

8.07 ± 0.14e

1.92 ± 0.01f

2.94 ± 0.03d

88.89 ± 0.25b

282.4 ± 7.64e,f

LJ89 + 30% FC

13.63 ± 0.16h

7.53 ± 0.08f,g

1.74 ± 0.01i

3.08 ± 0.04c

92.05 ± 0.38a

371.8 ± 7.64b

L17 + 30% FC

17.59 ± 0.08e

9.74 ± 0.20c

1.98 ± 0.01e

2.96 ± 0.02d

84.58 ± 0.25c

273.7 ± 5.77e,f

LN75 + 30% FC

18.31 ± 0.04d

8.6 ± 0.04d

1.81 ± 0.02h

3.04 ± 0.02c,d

80.13 ± 0.76e

293.9 ± 7.63d,e

LN74 + 30% FC

15.2 ± 0.15g

7.28 ± 0.15g

1.86 ± 0.01g

3.28 ± 0.04a

85.01 ± 0.25c

293.9 ± 12.58d,e

L34 + 30% FC

20.48 ± 0.44c

9.57 ± 014c

2.07 ± 0.01d

3.05 ± 0.01c,d

80.99 ± 0.38e

233.3 ± 2.9g

L32 + 30% FC

21.18 ± 0.17b

11.3 ± 0.16b

2.21 ± 0.01b

3.34 ± 0.04a

92.77 ± 0.50a

262.2 ± 4.99f

LJ10 + 30% FC

10.7 ± 0.57i

7.66 ± 0.11e,f

1.93 ± 0.01f

3.17 ± 0.03b

78.69 ± 0.38f

354.5 ± 5.77b,c

LN19 + 30% FC

15.1 ± 0.08g

7.15 ± 0.12g

1.768 ± 0.03i

2.97 ± 0.01d

83.00 ± 0.62d

343.0 ± 2.88c

Control (60% FC)

21.3 ± 0.19b

9.3 ± 0.08c

2.12 ± 0.01c

2.74 ± 0.01d

72.94 ± 0.25g

305.5 ± 4.99d

Control (30% FC)

8.76 ± 0.06j

4.24 ± 0.02h

1.27 ± 0.01j

2.21 ± 0.03e

44.35 ± 0.52h

458.4 ± 10.40a

  1. The results were recorded after 45 days of sowing.
  2. #Numerical values presented in the table are mean ± standard error.
  3. Means with same letters are not significantly different at 95% confidence level.