Table 2 The comparison of TG hydrogel/SF/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with other reported resarches in hyperthermia process.
Entry | MNPs | Nanocomposite | The optimum concentration of nanocomposite (mg/mL) | SAR (w/g ) | Magnetic saturation (emu/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fe3O4 | SA hydrogel/SF/HNTs/Fe3O4 | 5 | 22.3 | 15.96 | |
2 | Fe3O4 | CN-CMC hydrogel/SF/Fe3O4 | 1 | 7 | 38.0 | |
3 | Fe3O4 | Magnetic chitosan-g-poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) | 2 | ~ 204 | ~ 37 | |
4 | Fe3O4 | MNHG-1-Fe | 20 | 25 | 11 | |
5 | Fe3O4 | DOX-Fe3O4@agar | – | ~ 18.9 | 41.9 | |
6 | Fe3O4 | TG hydrogel/SF/Fe3O4 | 1 | 41.2 | 48.76 | This work |
