Figure 6
From: Improved phase-to-height mapping method combine with device attitude

Comparison result of different methods (1) Method 1–2 (2) Method 2–2 (3) Method 3 (4) Method 4 (5) The proposed method (6) The mean absolute error for each method.
From: Improved phase-to-height mapping method combine with device attitude

Comparison result of different methods (1) Method 1–2 (2) Method 2–2 (3) Method 3 (4) Method 4 (5) The proposed method (6) The mean absolute error for each method.